ShareThis Page
Charges filed after hotel bar fight |

Charges filed after hotel bar fight

| Saturday, January 6, 2007 12:00 a.m

The manager of a bar at the Days Inn hotel in Butler Township was charged Friday with simple assault after he was accused of fighting with a man who became belligerent and refused to leave after the bar closed, authorities said.

Police were questioning witnesses and said charges might be filed against others.

“The initial description of this event has changed, and we are talking to several witnesses,” Butler Township police Chief Gary Garman said.

Nathan McCloskey, 28, of Butler, is accused in connection with a Dec. 10 fight that left Brian Roush, 23, of Butler Township, seriously injured. Police said Roush was found lying outside the hotel about 3:15 a.m. that morning. He was unconscious and had a severe head injury.

Roush, who remains in the Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit at Mercy Hospital, Uptown, is unable to talk or write, Garman said.

Authorities filed a misdemeanor charge against McCloskey because it appears “it was their mutual decision to fight,” Garman said.

McCloskey, who still works at the hotel, declined comment except to say Roush is a good friend of his.

McCloskey’s lawyer, Michael Zunder, did not return telephone calls yesterday seeking comment.

According to police, Roush was drinking in Frisco’s, the hotel bar, and after the bar closed, he became belligerent toward staff and several times refused to leave.

Roush and McCloskey argued and then went outside and engaged in a fistfight, police said. McCloskey is accused of striking Roush several times in the head and face, police said.

“Obviously this is not the proper way to handle this,” Garman said. “They should have just called the police and let us deal with the problem.”

A punch knocked Roush unconscious, and he suffered skull fractures, police said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.