Charleroi fire damages 100-year-old residence |

Charleroi fire damages 100-year-old residence

CHARLEROI – An electrical fire caused damage to the first floor of a home on Lincoln Avenue Tuesday morning.

The alarm for the fire at the three-story brick home at 215 Lincoln Ave. sounded at 10:48 a.m.

Charleroi Fire Chief Bob Whiten said the first firefighters on the scene saw flames in the living room and front area of the home.

“The fire was under control in about 10 minutes,” Whiten said. “We stayed on the scene for about an hour and a half for salvage purposes, as well as for the investigation.”

The 100-year-old house is owned by Evan and Kristy Bell, who were not home at the time of the blaze.

“The owners have a couple of kids and nobody was home when the fire broke out,” Whiten said. “The owners did show up later.”

The family’s cat, Dobbie, was discovered in the basement of the home and was rescued.

Whiten said a state police fire marshal declared the fire was electrical in nature and determined there was no foul play involved.

Volunteer firefighters from Charleroi were joined by North Charleroi, Fallowfield Township, Allenport, Stockdale, Roscoe, North Belle Vernon and Rostraver Central departments at the scene.

“I called for so many departments because of where the house was located,” said Whiten, who explained the house sits atop a steep hill in an historic section of the community.

Whiten said no firefighters were injured fighting the blaze.

As for the house, he said it was not a total loss although the structure suffered “heavy heat and smoke damage.”

Whiten said it appeared the fire started at the front of the home.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.