Charleroi man flushes his freedom down toilet |

Charleroi man flushes his freedom down toilet

A Charleroi man appears to have flushed his freedom down the toilet.

Shaun McGavitt, 23, of 540 Washington Ave., has been at the Westmoreland County Prison since Tuesday morning, after Monessen police say he had flooded their holding cell area for the second time in two days.

Charleroi police took McGavitt to the Monessen station on Monday evening and requested he be put in one of the cells.

Mon Valley police departments commonly hold suspects in Monessen because the department is the only one nearby with a holding area.

Police put McGavitt in cell No. 1, where they said he began to flush the toilet over and over, causing the cell block and walkway to flood.

At that point, officers took McGavitt out of the cell and into the processing room. He began yelling at them before ripping a telephone off the wall and damaging a computer, police said.

He then was taken to night court and arraigned on charges of criminal mischief and disorderly conduct.

Hours later, McGavitt was taken back to Monessen and put in another holding cell, where police say he began flushing the toilet again, causing another flood.

After being taken back to night court, McGavitt was arraigned on charges of institutional vandalism, criminal mischief and disorderly conduct.

Then he went to a county holding cell because he was unable to post $5,000 straight bond.

McGavitt was scheduled for a preliminary hearing on both sets of charges today before District Justice Joseph Dalfonso of Monessen.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.