ShareThis Page
Charleroi starts busy Legion weekend with rainout |

Charleroi starts busy Legion weekend with rainout

The Valley Independent
| Saturday, June 8, 2002 12:00 a.m

CHARLEROI – After a rainout Friday at Waynesburg, Charleroi is in store for its busiest weekend of the season.

Charleroi (3-1) plays its first doubleheader of the early season today and has two more games in the next two days.

The first Fayette American Legion League game is at 11 a.m. against Plum and the nightcap follows four hours later against Lincoln Park. Both are exhibition contests.

Charleroi then plays its third game of the weekend Sunday at Farmington, and begins the week at home against California. They are section games.

Charleroi coach Tom Hartman is not too concerned about having to play four games in three days. He said he would be happy to see his team go 3-1 in the four-game stretch.

“I’m not worked about the two exhibition games,” he said. “I’m more worried about the other games.

“Our starters will start in game one. It’s important to get these games in.”

Pitcher Jason Cypher, the scheduled starter for Friday’s game, will not go against Plum. He instead will pitch either Sunday or Monday.

Derek DiPiazza is expected to take to the mound Saturday in the first game.

The team is coming off its only loss of the season, a 10-7 loss to Uniontown.

Five starters for Charleroi did not play in the game. All but one player, Trevor Consavage, who is going to Florida to look at a college, are expected to be in the lineup for the upcoming games.

“We’ll be all right,” Hartman said. “The people who played (against Uniontown) played excellent.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.