Charleroi to hold line on taxes in 2011 |

Charleroi to hold line on taxes in 2011

Charleroi taxpayers could face no increase in real estate taxes, according to the tentative budget that will be proposed this week.

When council meets Wednesday, it is expected to approve posting a 2011 budget that holds the line on taxes.

While the final spending plan would be scheduled for approval in December, it cannot include tax millage above the rate set in the tentative budget.

The tentative document that council is expected to approve would again set the millage at 42.15 mills – 30 mils for general purposes, 7.43 mills for street lighting, 3 mills for fire service, 1.26 mills for debt service, 0.2 of a mill for recreation, 0.12 of a mill for library, 0.1 of a mill for shade tree and 0.04 of a mill for pensions.

The $2,490,414 tentative budget would increase expenditures by $46,610 over the 2010 budget.

Expenditures in the proposed budget are:

n Administration – $857,810, an increase of $7,719;

n Police – $778,388, an increase of $17,948;

n Fire – $99,343, a decrease of $871;

n Streets – $708,812, an increase of $21,265.

Mayor Nancy Ellis said borough officials are pleased to hold the line on taxes. She praised the efforts of borough manager Bob Hodgson and the cooperation of council in preparing the budget.

“We worked very hard and did a lot of work on the budget,” Ellis said. “We scrutinized everything line by line. It’s hard because everything goes up, but we’re doing the best we can. We cut where we could.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.