Chartiers Valley reverses course, votes to raise taxes |

Chartiers Valley reverses course, votes to raise taxes

Chartiers Valley School District officials had a change of plans with the district's $62 million budget for 2016-17.

Instead of dipping into savings to balance the budget, board members approved, by a 7-2 vote, the final budget with a 0.39-mill property tax increase.

“We really worked hard not to have a millage increase,” Superintendent Brian White said.

The property tax increase is the first for the district since 2010. The new property-tax rate is 16.6067 mills, which is lowest among Allegheny County school districts.

For residents who own property assessed at $100,000, their increase will amount to $38.92. The new property-tax rate will generate $884,000 for the district.

In May, the board approved a preliminary budget with no property tax increase by using $1.3 million in savings. Since the preliminary approval, administrators trimmed $500,000 in expenses.

Board member Julie Murphy voted against the budget, citing savings of $4.3 million.

“It's hard to justify the tax hike,” Murphy said.

Board member Jeff Choura opposed the final budget because of residents' feedback.

“When I was campaigning, a number of constituents told me to try and hold the line on taxes,” Choura said.

Both Murphy and Choura agreed that administrators and board members worked well together to keep expenses low.

White said revenue projections did not match expenditures for the current budget year, including a slower-than-expected intake of earned income tax. About $700,000 was expected to be collected from earned income tax and the mercantile tax by the end of June. The district also received $223,952 less than projected in the governor's 2015-16 state budget.

Factors affecting the district's budget in the future include its contributions to the Public School Employees' Retirement System, to which Chartiers Valley will contribute $4.5 million in 2016-17. In 2010-11, by comparison, Chartiers Valley's contribution totaled about $712,000.

White acknowledged that district officials underestimated the impact of the 2012 Allegheny County property assessments.

Director of Finance Nick Morelli said 1,075 district residents filed appeals, which resulted in about a 30 percent reduction in property value in the district.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5805 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.