ShareThis Page
Chemicals, equipment seized in California drug raid |

Chemicals, equipment seized in California drug raid

CALIFORNIA – Agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and local police Tuesday seized chemicals and lab equipment from a suspected drug manufacturing operation in a borough apartment.

California Police Officer in Charge Rick Encapera said a 23-year-old man living in an apartment complex at 109 Green St. consented to the search.

Encapera said the California University of Pennsylvania public safety department received reports weeks ago of suspected drug activity at the apartment.

He said police and DEA agents searched the apartment noon Tuesday.

The agents detained the man and questioned him yesterday, Encapera said.

Encapera said no charges have been filed and it is undetermined if narcotics were being produced.

“I heard on a news report that it was ecstasy. That’s more information than I have,” Encapera said. “It’s up to the chemist to determine what was made. It’s all still under investigation.”

Michele McCoy, Cal U director of public affairs, said the man recently withdrew from school.

“Apparently, he was registered for classes,” she said. “I don’t know if he went to those classes or anything. But, come April 5, he withdrew.”

McCoy said some of the courses the student signed up for were Internet classes he could take at home.

She said it is fortunate someone went to the police to report the problem.

“We were on top of it. Our university police had information on it about two weeks ago,” she said. “It’s good news in a way, because we don’t tolerate that and it makes an example.”

California Mayor Casey Durdines said the raid went on without incident.

“I think this is really a step in the right direction,” he said. “It’s a shame that this kind of activity is going on in California. I’m glad it was taken care of safely. Hopefully, this sends a message to anyone doing illegal activities in California.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.