ShareThis Page
Cheswick plans waterline improvement |

Cheswick plans waterline improvement

| Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:00 a.m

Cheswick officials will begin planning a waterline improvement project that will benefit a riverfront commercial park.

The project is expected to be paid for by a $105,000 federal Community Development Block Grant and Rick Reed, the owner of the property. There will be no tax dollars used, officials said.

The project consists of extending a waterline below the railroad tracks to the riverfront property and linking to a four-inch borough line near Pittsburgh Street.

Borough Engineer Larry Seiler said the project will enable installation of at least two fire hydrants and generally improve the lines. That would allow Reed to further develop his property. Currently, there is no fire protection on the property, Seiler said.

According to council, Reed is willing to pay costs up to $40,000 in order to secure the project’s completion. As part of the grant agreement, Seiler said Reed will have to create at least four jobs within three years.

“That’s not hard to do,” he said.

If the job creation goal isn’t met, however, council may be responsible for repaying the grant money.

Council’s decision Tuesday to move forward with a developer’s agreement with Reed was made with one councilman opposing it.

Brian Harvanek said he doesn’t believe the borough should take responsibility for improving the property.

“If a developer is going to develop the property, he needs to do that,” Harvanek said.

Other council members maintain the improvements would ultimately benefit the borough because of the new jobs and a potential increase in commercial tax revenues.

Seiler and Solicitor Tony Colangelo assured council the idea of a municipality securing a grant to improve commercial properties isn’t new. They said it’s been done several times in Allegheny County.

Seiler said council hopes to solicit bids by the end of March and begin construction by August. The grant stipulates the project is completed by the end of the year, he said.

Council is hoping this will become the first of a two-phase project.

Originally, the borough applied for $210,000, but was only granted half of that.

Seiler said although that amount wasn’t available this year, there’s a strong possibility the borough could secure the remaining amount next year if the first phase is completed successfully.

If the money is granted to the borough, it will be used to replace an existed four-inch line with a six-inch line, Seiler said.

“There are no guarantees,” he said. “But they said they would look favorably on the project.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.