‘Chief monster’ says jobs market is in transition |

‘Chief monster’ says jobs market is in transition

Jeffrey Taylor, who practically launched online job-searching with a decade ago, says it’s going to remain a tough market for labor for about five more years.

Then, he expects job seekers to regain the upper hand.

“There’s a transition taking place,” said Taylor, chief monster (his actual title). “I think we’ll be in the worst labor shortage of our lifetime beginning in 2008.”

Taylor, 42, believes in about five years will come the kind of “free-agent mentality” that typified much of the 1990s. He says it will stem from old boomers exiting the work force and from a broader skill set among those still working.

Monster launched its now-famous Web site for job seekers in 1993, beginning with about 150,000 job postings. Today, the Internet site boasts more than 1 million job ads and a database of about 26 million resumes. Monster currently operates in 19 countries

Taylor spoke by telephone from Massachusetts on Friday before appearing at the Pittsburgh Human Resources Association’s annual convention at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center on Oct. 8 and 9.

“Today, you have a high supply (of labor), which means employers have more choices,” he said. “Companies are also cutting costs, so they are clearing out people who aren’t contributing and upgrading talent at the same time.”

Currently on a multicity speaking tour, Taylor is telling job seekers that even in this down market, there are positions available.

“But it’s competitive, and you need more-realistic expectations about how much time it will take to find a job,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.