ShareThis Page
Citi shares sink despite talks |

Citi shares sink despite talks

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK — Citigroup Inc.’s stock sank Monday to its lowest levels since November as investors wondered how much more cash the troubled bank will need.

Citigroup Inc., in an effort to raise capital, is working out a deal to sell the bulk of its retail brokerage to Morgan Stanley. The joint venture — expected to be announced later this week — would lead to an after-tax gain for Citigroup of about $5 billion to $6 billion, a person close to the negotiations said yesterday. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the ongoing talks.

But maintaining cash levels that are high enough to make up for upcoming loan losses remains a big challenge for Citigroup.

“While we believe this deal will provide some near-term capital relief, more likely will be needed,” Meredith Whitney, a financial analyst at Oppenheimer & Co., wrote in a note yesterday.

Citigroup stock fell $1.15, or 17 percent, to $5.60 yesterday — making it by far the steepest decliner among the 30 stocks that make up the Dow Jones industrial average — even though many industry analysts were positive about the deal. Lauren Smith at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods said in a note that the potential joint venture “seems like a win-win to us.”

Morgan Stanley shares fell 27 cents to $18.79 after rising in earlier trading. Most bank stocks tumbled yesterday after President-elect Barack Obama said he plans to fundamentally change the way the second half of the government’s $700 billion financial bailout fund is spent. He said he will target housing and small businesses.

Citigroup lost more than $20 billion between October 2007 and October 2008, and is expected to post a deficit for the final quarter of last year when it reports those results next week. The government has loaned Citigroup $45 billion and agreed to absorb the losses on a huge pool of mortgages and other assets.

“We’ve seen various indications that Citibank’s problems run deep. The fact that the government came in and backstopped some of their assets was one signal of that. Citi’s selling the majority share of Smith Barney is probably another such signal,” said Jim Wilcox, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.

Smith Barney for years has been regarded as one of Citigroup’s few strong businesses.

Citigroup is not alone in its problems, but where it differs from its peers — JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. — is the degree to which it bet on a strong housing market and ample liquidity in the credit markets. Even in July 2007, several months into the housing downturn, Citigroup’s then-CEO Charles Prince told the Financial Times: “When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing.”

Morgan Stanley — which got $10 billion in government financing — is likely to pay Citigroup between $2 billion and $3 billion in cash for a 51 percent stake in Citi’s brokerage, Smith Barney, the person close to the talks said. In total, after accounting for the revaluation of Smith Barney, Citigroup would get a pre-tax gain of $10 billion, or $5 billion to $6 billion after taxes, the person said.

Morgan Stanley would then have the option to buy the rest of Smith Barney during the next three to five years, the person said. The joint venture between Smith Barney and Morgan Stanley’s retail brokerage, the former Dean Witter, would employ a team of more than 20,000 and rival Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch in size.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.