ShareThis Page
City needs to face its water woes |

City needs to face its water woes

| Sunday, March 25, 2007 12:00 a.m

Pittsburgh has this problem, too, and it stinks. The great city of London dumps raw sewage into its famous river, the Thames.

This outrage to civil society happens every time the British capital gets too much rainfall. Gutters flow with ankle-deep “rivers,” pedestrians have to jump over, sewers back up and the flush-aways of kitchen, bathroom and too many industries pour out into the storied waterway that flows under Tower Bridge to the sea.

It’s revolting. But it happens just like that in Allegheny County. And most citizens don’t realize, or prefer not to think about it, here or there.

Something else is in common. Big money is going to have to be spent in both watersheds.

For London, the bill came in last week. Two billion pounds. Equalling $3.9 billion-odd (probably an underestimate). Or about 10 times the cost for our subway extension now burrowing under the Allegheny.

The Brits, however, are going to get a heroic dig for their money.

Imagine a hole in the ground 20 miles long, more than seven yards wide, and at its deepest about 250 feet below the river it’s meant to save.

That’s the Tideway Tunnel, designed to divert 32 million cubic meters of sewage overflows per year right around the city from west to east. All it takes in London sometimes is an incredible two millimeters of rain — that little, according to Bloomberg News — and you don’t want to go boating on the Thames. The city’s storm sewers go back in part to the 1800s, a reaction to the “Great Stink” experienced in the Industrial Revolution.

The same, on a different scale, goes for Pittsburgh. Municipalities among these rainy hills and flood-prone valleys feed into Alcosan, the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority. Take a tour of its treatment plant by the Ohio River. You’ll hear about billions in storm sewer requirements under federal law right now. But not yet realistically budgeted.

Here’s a bright side. The work when it comes will bring a bonanza to design, digging, construction and materials firms. And jobs a-plenty.

Most Londoners “would be shocked,” said an environmental official, to learn that the Thames yearly receives sewage that could fill 12,800 Olympic swimming pools. It kills fish, imperils health and dims the tourist appeal of the river sung by Shakespeare and Dickens. Two barges in London pump up 30 tons of oxygen a day into the Thames to give it “life.”

When the new tunnel is completed — a 13-year project — it will be the largest undertaking of its type in British public works history and should serve London for 100 years.

But it won’t come cheap to the millions who inhabit in the place. A gradual rise in customer water bills should peak in 2019 at a cumulative hike of 37 pounds a year, say $70 at today’s rates. That’s about 13 percent. But modern life can’t treat rivers like sewers. London’s facing it. When will Pittsburgh?

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.