ShareThis Page
City to get $10 million up front for G-20 security |

City to get $10 million up front for G-20 security

Jeremy Boren
| Friday, August 14, 2009 12:00 a.m

U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills, said today federal officials have promised to put $10 million toward security costs during the Group of 20 economic summit in September.

The total cost will be about $19 million, meaning the state, county and city must make up the balance.

Doyle said Gov. Ed Rendell agreed to chip in $6.3 million, including an in-kind contribution of 60 state troopers woth $1.8 million. The city and county have reserves to cover the remaining $2.7 million, he said.

“I want to thank President Obama, Governor Rendell, Senators (Arlen) Specter and (Bob) Casey, and Congressman Doyle for their work in making sure Pittsburgh has the resources necessary to host a safe and successful G-20 summit,” Mayor Luke Ravenstahl said in a statement released by his office.

Doyle learned of the $10 million committment from the U.S. Department of Justice during a conference call today with Valerie Jarrett, a senior advisor and assistant to Obama, Ravenstahl, Rendell and Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato.

“The good news is the money from DOJ is ready to go, it will probably be just a matter of weeks to get it” Doyle said.

The summit is Sept. 24-25 in the David L. Lawerence Convention Center, Dowtown.

Jarrett is scheduled to speak to the Netroots Nation conference at the convention center tomorrow morning.

Most of the money will be used to pay salary and overtime to about 4,000 police officers who will be assigned to monitor anti-capitalist protestors expected to number in the tens of thousands.

“It looks like we’ve got this pretty much taken care of,” Doyle said. “We were always confident it was going to come through. It was just a matter if going through the process.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.