ShareThis Page
City to vote on purchasing office merger |

City to vote on purchasing office merger

| Wednesday, November 2, 2005 12:00 p.m

Pittsburgh City Council will examine a cost-cutting measure Nov. 9 that would merge the purchasing offices of the city and Allegheny County.

The merger is a step toward council’s goal of consolidating many city and county functions. In 2004, the city and county successfully merged 911 emergency services.

Dale Perrett, director of the city’s General Services Department, which oversees purchasing, said the office is operating with a staff of three — down from eight — in anticipation of the merger.

Perrett needs council’s approval to complete the move and transfer the city’s purchasing office to county property by the beginning of the year. He said he doesn’t anticipate problems getting that approval.

Once the governments begin joint purchasing of everything from uniforms to electricity, overall costs for both should fall. The city and county spend $39 million a year on uniforms, utilities, telecommunications and vehicle purchases and repairs, according to an analysis done as part of the city’s financial recovery plan.

By 2006, the plan’s estimates put the city’s savings from the merger at $315,000 in staff consolidation and $500,000 from joint purchasing.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.