ShareThis Page
Clairton cruises into semifinals |

Clairton cruises into semifinals

Nathan Smith
| Saturday, November 13, 2010 12:00 a.m

Clairton rolled to its 26th consecutive victory Friday night, romping past Bishop Canevin, 47-0, in a WPIAL Class A quarterfinal at Elizabeth Forward’s Warrior Stadium.

Clairton advanced to the semifinals, where it will face Springdale next Friday.

The Bears drove to the goal line on their opening possession but faced fourth-and-goal at the 1-yard line. Tyler Boyd grabbed the handoff but ran into a roadblock; Boyd kept his balance and tossed the ball back to quarterback Desimon Green, who ran in for the score to make it 7-0.

The Crusaders made a crucial stop midway through the first quarter but gave the opportunity away after a roughing-the-kicker penalty. It would have been only the fifth punt by Clairton this season.

Green left late in the second quarter with a cramp in his calf. The Bears did not miss a beat; Capri Thompson filled in and completed a 36-yard pass to Trenton Coles for a touchdown.

“We just came out and did what we’ve done all year,” coach Tom Nola said. “The guys played hard.”

Clairton’s Josh Page had four interceptions; he also caught three passes for 95 yards. Bishop Canevin was led by Chris Walko, who had 28 yards on eight carries.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.