ShareThis Page
Climate change |

Climate change

Letter To The Editor
| Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:00 p.m

In a new Penn State study on global warming, Department of Environmental Resources Secretary John Quigley refers to its findings as “profoundly disturbing.” The research predicts dire health problems for Pennsylvanians — increased respiratory and heart diseases, insect-borne illnesses, allergies and heat-related deaths.

The overwhelming scientific evidence blames climate change on the excessive burning of fossil fuels — coal, natural gas and oil. But instead of taking major steps to curtail our use of these fuels, we exacerbate the problem with the “drill, baby, drill” mentality.

The Marcellus drilling hype overlooks the fact that natural gas methane contributes 85 times more to global warming than carbon dioxide produced from burning coal. And a study by the University of Pennsylvania and Columbia University shows the negative health effects for those living near shale drilling are overwhelming. This has led Maryland to ban fracking and New York to issue a moratorium on it while our citizens continue to be used as guinea pigs.

Pope Francis, in his encyclical Laudato Si, warns the world of the disastrous consequences of climate change. The VND editorial page has denigrated the pope’s message. The Penn State report should be another wake-up call to the VND that climate change is real and foreboding.

As Pope Francis states, “God forgives, but Creation does not.”

Ron Slabe

Upper Burrell

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.