Clinton focuses on economy’s future in speech |

Clinton focuses on economy’s future in speech

NEW YORK — Hillary Clinton offered a detailed agenda Friday meant to encourage American companies to invest for the future — and focus less on short-term profits.

Her prescriptions were notable but incremental: tax increases for high earners who sell their investments within six years, steps to curb executive pay and corporate stock buybacks, and an endorsement of New York state’s plan to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour for fast-food workers.

Clinton criticized corporations, particularly publicly traded ones, for so-called “quarterly capitalism” — taking steps to boost profits instead of investing in training, research and other measures that improve competitiveness and national economic growth over time.

The most controversy hinged on her plan to raise capital-gains taxes on some shorter-term investments made by high-income investors.

Those investors who fall into the top federal income tax bracket of 39.6 percent, which is roughly those earning upwards of $400,000 in income a year, would pay higher taxes on investments held between one and six years.

Gains realized in less than one year are taxed at a base rate of nearly 40 percent, and everything else is taxed at 20 percent. Clinton would extend the 39.6 percent rate to investments held for up to two years. Then she would implement gradually declining rates for investments held for several years after that, ending with the 20 percent rate for those held longer than six years.

Conservatives called the plan a tax hike on investors and complained that it would be a symbolic move, at best, for the problem Clinton seeks to address.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.