ShareThis Page
Coach, Conns, Rowan among January rebound candidates |

Coach, Conns, Rowan among January rebound candidates

The stock market’s “January effect” is really the confluence of three effects. Stocks, in general, tend to rise in January. Small stocks tend to lead. And last year’s losers often come back strongly — the “January rebound” or “January bounce.”

In this column, I suggest five stocks with January rebound potential. I compile this list in November because the rebound — which occurs most years but not all — sometimes starts as early as December.

I think there will be a meaningful bounce for 2014’s losers in January. Why? Because quite a few investors, professional and amateur, are in the same position I’m in.

I achieved a lot of unrealized gains for my clients in 2013. In 2014, I sold some of those stocks, incurring taxable gains. So lately, I have been selling my losers to reduce the tax bite my clients face. Others surely are doing the same.

The January rebound is mostly a tax-driven phenomenon. Stocks that sag in January through September get kicked while they’re down by tax-motivated sellers in October and November. Some of those stocks become bargains.


One that I expect to rebound is Coach Inc. (COH), a New York City-based company that purveys upscale purses and accessories. Coach is down 36 percent this year through Nov. 14 on disappointing results.

But some companies would love a bad year like Coach is having. Last quarter, it earned $119 million on sales of $1 billion.

Coach shares sell for 14 times the past four quarters’ earnings and yield 3.9 percent in dividends.


Conns Inc. (CONN), with headquarters in The Woodlands, Texas, retails appliances in the southern United States. The stock has cratered as the chain incurred too many defaults on consumer debts and was widely viewed as offering overly liberal borrowing terms to consumers.

However, I feel that the loss year-to-date of more than 59 percent is overdone. I expect the feeble housing recovery to gain some oomph, in which case appliance sales would likely perk up. The company is exploring options, including selling itself outright or selling off its consumer lending operation.


Hanger Inc. (HGR) makes orthopedic and prosthetic products such as braces and artificial limbs. The Austin company operates more than 700 clinics nationwide serving orthopedic and prosthetic patients.

The stock has fallen 46 percent this year as it delayed filing a financial statement, then reported a big increase in bad debts after intensified audits by Medicare. Predictably, it faces a spate of class-action lawsuits.

There is no way to cast that development as good news, but it’s the kind of bad news that frequently dissipates after a while.


The energy sector has been slammed in the past five months. Oil prices have fallen hard from about $104 to about $78 a barrel.

For long-term investors, I don’t think the time to buy is at hand. But for traders, I think there will be a playable bounce in January. One stock that I think would work well is Rowan Companies plc (RDC), an offshore drilling contractor that is down 32 percent this year.

Prices for offshore work are falling, but Rowan has shown staying power over the years.

Pier 1

Fifth and finally, I recommend Pier 1 Imports Inc. (PIR), which operates a chain of more than 1,000 import shops in the United States and Canada. The dollar has been strong lately against most other currencies, a trend I expect to continue in 2015.

For Pier 1, with its head office in Fort Worth, a strong dollar means that the goods it imports from Asia will be cheaper, which should help profits in 2015. The stock is down almost 40 percent this year, and I think it has been punished too much.

Past results

Prior to today, I’ve written 11 columns with January bounce picks. The average 12-month return on my selections has been 12.3 percent, compared with 8.2 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.

Seven of the 11 sets of recommendations have been profitable, and six have beaten the S&P 500.

Last year’s list narrowly beat the S&P in January but lagged it for the 12 months from Nov. 19, 2013, through Nov. 14, 2014. The 12-month return was 7.3 percent, compared with 16.4 percent for the index.

Bear in mind that past performance doesn’t predict future results. My column picks are theoretical and make no allowance for trading costs or taxes. Results of my column recommendations shouldn’t be confused with the performance of accounts I manage for clients.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Boston. He can be reached at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.