ShareThis Page
College credits in peril for high schoolers |

College credits in peril for high schoolers

| Monday, June 6, 2011 12:00 a.m

Tyler Bubin could save about $26,000 and graduate a year early from college because of Woodland Hills School District’s dual enrollment program, which allows seniors, and sometimes juniors, to earn high school and college credits at the same time by taking classes at a university or community college.

Future students might not be so lucky.

Some districts that covered the costs of college courses could require families to foot the bill beginning this fall if lawmakers agree to Gov. Tom Corbett’s budget proposal to eliminate the program money. Districts also could reduce the number of students who participate.

Woodland Hills paid tuition, fees and transportation costs for Bubin and others in the dual enrollment program.

“It was a great opportunity to get a lot of the education done for cheap,” said Bubin, 18, of Wilkins, who plans to attend Miami University of Ohio this fall. He has taken nine college classes since the spring semester of his junior year.

“I fit in well, and it prepared me for college-level courses,” he said. “It was a lot more independent. I liked that. It definitely challenged you.”

In Western Pennsylvania, 83 school districts received about $1 million from the state this year for dual enrollment programs. Statewide, districts got $6.95 million.

“The purpose of dual enrollment was to make (college) more affordable to a wider range of students,” said Tom Shipley, director of secondary education for the Greensburg Salem School District. “We’re still supporting dual enrollment … but all of the cost would be borne by the student.”

Between 2006-07 and 2010-11, the number of districts seeking state money for dual enrollment jumped 27 percent.

West Mifflin High School Principal Mark Hoover said if the district loses the $11,000 it receives, it won’t be able to offer the program for free anymore. The district spends $15,000 of its money on the program.

“Unfortunately, that type of perk has to go away,” he said.

Mackenzie DiDominic, 18, was among 23 seniors who participated in West Mifflin’s program this year. She took four classes at Community College of Allegheny County’s South Campus “because my high school classes were very limited.”

DiDominic took science and economics courses at CCAC, earning enough college credits to completed her first semester toward a degree in business marketing at the University of Pittsburgh.

“It was a better chance to get the credits and fill my schedule with classes that were actually worth something,” she said.

Woodland Hills got about $71,000 in state money — the most among districts in the region because of the large number of low-income students involved — to transport 12 students to Point Park University and CCAC’s Boyce Campus. The district paid the students’ tuition.

Despite needing to cut a projected $8.5 million from its budget, Superintendent Walter Calinger said Woodland Hills will keep funding its dual enrollment program at this year’s level.

“Our parents and our district in general is poor, and we have to give our students a change at higher education,” he said. “It’s a way of giving them a leg up on college and the expense.”

Only two South Allegheny High School students participated in the program this year; it cost the state about $7,500. The district has not decided whether to support the program if state money ends, spokeswoman Laura Thomson said.

Autumn Craven, 17, of Lincoln, a senior at South Allegheny, said dual enrollment helped jump-start her planned nursing career. She earned enough credits to graduate a semester early.

“My dad got diagnosed with heart problems (four years ago), and when we were in the hospital, I’d watch the nurses come in,” said Craven, who enrolled in CCAC’s nursing program.

“I became a nurse’s aide going to the (Steel Center Career Technical School), and I wanted to start working — and once I started, I thought, ‘I should really start in the RN program now,'” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.