ShareThis Page
Columbus Day 2010: Still worth celebrating |

Columbus Day 2010: Still worth celebrating

| Monday, October 11, 2010 12:00 a.m

(Editor’s note: On this Columbus Day, a reprint of a Trib editorial.)

Thank goodness for Christopher Columbus. Today we wholeheartedly celebrate the renowned explorer whose courage and conviction defied provincial thinking and opened up a new world to the vast possibilities of mankind’s ingenuity.

It’s a celebration as well of man’s indomitable spirit and unrelenting drive, even against great adversity, to advance beyond the conventional, to put aside superstitions — and to achieve something astounding.

Writes Thomas A. Bowden of The Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, “Thus, the deeper meaning of Columbus Day is to celebrate the rational core of Western civilization, which flourished in the New World like a pot-bound plant liberated from its confining shell, demonstrating to the world what greatness is possible to man at his best.”

Of course, do-nothings who reap from what Columbus sowed half a millennium ago vehemently denounce him as a blood-savage conqueror — and do so quite eloquently. Which suggests who knew how to advance civilization — and who obviously didn’t.

“Is there anything more insane than holding ancient people to moral standards that hadn’t been invented yet … holding modern people responsible for the acts of ancients who didn’t know any better,” notes libertarian L. Neil Smith.

Fortunately today we do know better.

Happy Columbus Day!

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.