ShareThis Page
Column: Deer Lakes’ future looks a little brighter |

Column: Deer Lakes’ future looks a little brighter

| Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:00 a.m

It’s 130 days until the official start of high school football, but new Deer Lakes coach Todd Hazlett is eager to go.

Hazlett, named to replace Denny Fedigan on Jan. 15, is a 1991 graduate of Deer Lakes and has selected his staff of assistants for the 2007 campaign.

First assistant and defensive coordinator for the Lancers will be Mike Leasure. Frank Piccolini will coach both the offensive and defensive lines, while Chuck Bellisario will handle the linebackers and running backs.

Mike Zourelias will handle the special teams, while Tom Crawford, a holdover from the former regime, will coach the ninth-grade team and will be assisted by Tom Wisniewski.

Turnout always is an issue when a program has had 11 consecutive losing seasons, but Hazlett is hoping for good numbers in an effort to turn around the team’s fortunes. Numbers, however, appear to be a strength in the younger grades as 25 freshmen are signed up and 24 more will be on the seventh- and eighth-grade teams. There reportedly is an equal number of players expected for the same age group with the West Deer Braves youth program.

Expected back for the Lancers is running back Brian Becker, who showed plenty of promise as a sophomore in 2005 with 738 yards rushing. Becker missed the 2006 season with a knee injury. Also returning is Matt Latronica, who took over quarterbacking duties early in 2005 and scored the winning touchdown in the Lancers’ last victory of ’06, a 20-14 decision over Farrell.

The schedule-maker didn’t do Hazlett any favors as he will make his varsity debut at one of the toughest places to play in the WPIAL, Kittanning’s Red Ullom Field, on Aug. 31.

Baseball rules changes

Not many rule changes took place during the high school baseball offseason.

One rule that will be enforced concerns free-lancing around the coach’s box.

Now, a player or coach occupying the coach’s box “shall remain there upon the batter entering the batter’s box until release of the pitch by the pitcher if requested by the opposing coach.”

Once the request is made, it applies to both teams for the remainder of the game.

Malicious contact vs. incidental contact also will be emphasized in an effort to prevent player injuries. Umpires now have the latitude to determine whether a collision is of a malicious nature.

Most collisions occur at home plate when a runner is trying to dislodge the ball from the catcher, though offensive or defensive players can be ejected if the umpire feels malicious contact has occurred.

According to the National Federation rule book, “Malicious contact is defined as (1) the contact is the result of excessive force or (2) there is intent to injure.” Umpires also have been instructed to be aware of situations “he may find himself in.”

In more cosmetic changes, players warming up in an unprotected area must have another player with a glove protect those warming up from batted or overthrown balls.

Additionally, players and coaches can now wear uniform patches commemorating milestones or special occasions if the patches do not exceed four square inches.

Sibling victories

It’s highly unusual when siblings each celebrate their first varsity pitching victories on the same day.

But that’s what happened last Friday at Burrell when junior Seth Napierkowski recorded his first pitching victory as the Bucs defeated East Allegheny. His sister, Tess, a freshman pitcher, was the pitcher of record in the Lady Bucs’ softball victory over Butler.

What’s more, both pitching victories came in relief.

George Guido is a Valley News Dispatch scholastic sports correspondent. His column appears Wednesdays.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.