Companies find profit in no-cash gambling games |

Companies find profit in no-cash gambling games


Major companies are enjoying big profits with gambling games that prohibit players from betting real money.

The idea of operators offering free-to-play slot machines, blackjack and poker might seem far-fetched. So might the prospect of people finding their gambling thrills with chips they can’t ever cash out.

But both are happening worldwide, and experts predict the phenomenon will grow in the next few years.

The buzz is about social gaming — more specifically, social-casino gaming. Casino-style games played on smartphones, tablets and computers generated $200 million worldwide in 2009; four years later, the total was 10 times as much, or more than $2 billion, according to Eilers Research of Anaheim Hills, Calif., which specializes in casino industry analysis.

Social games such as Farmville and Candy Crush are free to download and play. The genre of social casino games includes many slot machine and table games that are practically the same as their counterparts in real casinos. People can play for free but have the option of buying chunks of game credits for small amounts. DoubleDown Casino offers 150,000 chips for $3; 1 million chips have a regular price of $8 but sometimes sell for $1.

Joost van Dreunen, CEO of SuperData Research, a New York company specializing in social gaming, says 4 percent to 6 percent of social-casino players buy credits, with an average purchase of $40 to $60 per month.

“It’s more interesting (to play) if something’s at stake,” van Dreunen says. “What’s cool is wagering a few of your dollars, or maybe a little bit more, and that gives the game a much richer dimension.”

The credits are worthless outside the game. Players can never cash them in.

Several casino-related companies embrace social gaming. This month, slot manufacturer Bally Technologies agreed to pay as much as $100 million for Dragonplay, a social-gaming developer based in Israel. Slot maker International Game Technology owns DoubleDown, a top social-casino site on Facebook. In February, Caesar’s Entertainment, which operates Harrah’s, Caesar’s and Horseshoe casinos, bought its fourth social-gaming company.

MX Digital, a smaller game developer, plans to launch its branded slot machines on Facebook in mid-August, says co-owner Eric Bischoff, who gained fame with professional wrestling. MX brands, now used in online casinos overseas, include David Hasselhoff, Blues Brothers, Hulk Hogan and James Dean.

“We’re taking the same visual dynamics of the game, taking the codes, the math, all the things that make up our online slot machines, and we’re converting them so people can play with tokens,” says Bischoff, who lived in Penn Hills as a child. “You can play with friends, can play against friends, we’ll have a tournament platform, you can win tokens, you can give tokens. It’s more of a social experience than a waged casino experience.”

Adam Krejcik, managing director of digital and interactive gaming for Eilers Research, says social-casino providers can choose one of two paths.

Those who want new revenue and a potentially lucrative profit center can follow the Caesar’s Interactive example, offering the games as a separate business.

“They’re trying to push traffic globally, not necessarily trying to pull (players) into the property,” he says. “They’re trying to make money off you when you play these games.”

The other route, still in its early stages, is using social games to draw customers to a real casino, Krejcik says. Those operators focus less on making money from online games and more on enticing players to visit a real casino.

The key is that users prefer games with the same play and payout ratios as in traditional casinos.

“Not only are those games more popular,” Krejcik says, “but also they monetize at a better rate.”

Mark Gruetze is administrative editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7838 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.