ShareThis Page
Congress nixes loans to Iraq, Afghanistan |

Congress nixes loans to Iraq, Afghanistan

The Associated Press
| Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a victory for the White House, congressional negotiators agreed Wednesday not to include loans in an $87 billion package for Iraq and Afghanistan.

House-Senate conferees were close to finalizing details of a package that will resemble President Bush’s proposal to pay for military operations and rebuilding costs in the two countries next year.

But both Republicans and Democrats expressed frustration over what they described as the White House’s disdainful treatment of Congress on Iraq.

“You bump up to a degree of arrogance over and over,” said Rep. Frank Wolf, a Virginia Republican.

Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said, “It is an act of considerable statesmanship for a lot of people in this place to continue to support what the president is trying to do in Iraq given the smidgen of information we’re getting in return.”

But Republicans, including Wolf, rejected a Democratic proposal that would have required Senate confirmation for Bush’s civilian administrator in Iraq, the position held by L. Paul Bremer. Sen. Pete Domenici, a New Mexico Republican, rejected Democratic claims that this would make the administration more accountable.

“I’m not at all sure that the American people equate accountability with confirmation by the United States Senate,” he said.

The loan issue was the most divisive item as the House and Senate tried to resolve differences between their versions of the bill. A Senate amendment, passed with bipartisan support, would have required Iraq to pay back about half of the $18.4 billion in the bill for reconstruction and Iraqi security forces.

Loan supporters said U.S. taxpayers are already spending plenty on Iraq and that the country’s vast oil reserves should enable it to pay back some of the money eventually. Under the Senate bill, Iraq would not have had to repay the loan if other countries forgave 90 percent of the debt Iraq ran up under toppled leader Saddam Hussein.

Yesterday, World Bank President James Wolfensohn called on the United States and other rich nations to forgive at least two-thirds of Iraq’s foreign debt.

Bush threatened to veto the bill if the loan provisions were included. He and congressional Republican leaders argued that Iraq was already too deeply in debt to borrow more money and that there was no Iraqi government with the authority to take on new loans.

Domenici said the grants are needed to quickly improve conditions in Iraq and get U.S. troops home.

“America will be recompensed 50 times over if this thing gets ended and they have a strong country,” he said. “This money we’re arguing about will be a pittance when they become our friends in the international markets of oil.”

But Obey noted that much of the new aid pledged by other nations at an international donor’s conference last week was made as loans.

“It seems to me that we’re asking the U.S. taxpayers to be Uncle Sucker instead of Uncle Sam,” he said.

Senate conferees voted 16-13 not to insist on their loan amendment with their House counterparts. All Republicans voted no. Most were absent and their no votes were cast by proxy, including those of Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas and Ben Nighthorse Campbell of Colorado, who had supported the loans. One Democrat, Sen. Daniel Inouye of Hawaii, also opposed the loans.

On other issues, the conferees agreed to provide $500 million to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help it deal with recent disasters, including the California wildfires and Hurricane Isabel.

They also agreed to a pilot program to expand the military health insurance system known as Tricare to include members of the National Guard and Reserves who are unemployed or lack health insurance coverage. Activated reservists and Guard members will also be eligible for coverage for a longer period. This change will be in effect only until the budget year ends on Sept. 30, 2004.

The Pentagon had opposed the change.

“We think that’s probably not the best way to compensate the reserves,” its chief financial officer, Dov Zakheim said at a Pentagon news conference.

All members of the National Guard and Reserves are given military health care while on active duty, and the “overwhelming proportion” have health insurance when they’re not on active duty, Zakheim said.

Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota said the expansion of Tricare “is “a very productive start,” but that more needs to be done to help the National Guard and Reserves.

Conferees also agreed to provide $60 million for programs to strengthen women’s rights in Afghanistan and provided $200 million for Liberia, $100 million for Jordan and $20 million for Sudan.

After the final version is ironed out, the bill will have to be considered by both the House and Senate before going to Bush for his signature.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.