ShareThis Page
Congressional prattle |

Congressional prattle

| Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:00 a.m

We should all be thankful that we live in a country that is so content and well-off that its Congress can spend its time worrying about an alleged genocide in Armenia that occurred half a world away 92 years ago and had nothing to do with us (“House panel OKs genocide resolution: Turkey rejects Armenian claims and says U.S. claims would harm ties,” Oct. 11 and

Lest the House’s nonbinding resolution be misinterpreted, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “This has nothing to do with the Erdogan government (of Turkey) but with the Ottoman Empire.”

Since injustice has no statute of limitations, I see no reason why this grave moralizing be restricted to an empire that breathed its last in 1923.

What about the Persian Empire• The forefathers of that wretch Ahmedinejad killed untold numbers in ancient Greece — the birthplace of all the world’s democracies — and the U.S. Congress has never once weighed in on the matter.

There is not even one subcommittee in our Congress permanently devoted to these concerns as they prattle on about health care and Iraq and illegal immigration and blah, blah, blah.

Bob Simeone


Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.