Archive

Congressional Republicans seek repeal of National Labor Relations Board rule on union representation elections | TribLIVE.com
News

Congressional Republicans seek repeal of National Labor Relations Board rule on union representation elections

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans began a drive Monday to repeal a recent National Labor Relations Board rule updating procedures for union representation elections, setting up a likely veto showdown with President Obama.

Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said the GOP will employ a little-used law that permits the Senate to reject some federal agency regulations by majority vote and denies opponents the ability to thwart action through a filibuster.

Alexander said that by shortening the time between a union’s request for representation and the balloting, the NLRB had cleared the way for a new type of “ambush election” to take place that will disadvantage businesses and workers alike.

In remarks on the Senate floor, he said that under previous rules, 95 percent of union elections take place in 56 days or less from the filing of a petition. He said that under the new proposal, that would be reduced to as few as 11 days, which he said could be before an employer understands what’s happening.

In a written statement, NLRB Chairman Mark G. Pearce countered that “both businesses and workers deserve a process that is effective, fair and free of unnecessary delays, which is exactly what this rule strives to accomplish.”

Mirroring divisions in Congress, NLRB rule-making is often politically charged, with Republicans taking the side of business while Democrats are aligned with unions. In the case of the rule approved in December, the labor board split 3-2 along party lines.

The rule, which has been cheered by organized labor, eliminates a 25-day waiting period and seeks to reduce litigation that can be used to stall elections. It requires employers to furnish union organizers with email addresses and phone numbers of workers.

The NLRB rule is to take effect in April.

Alexander’s announcement was fresh evidence of the Republicans’ determination to use the power won in last fall’s elections, when they captured a Senate majority and strengthened their grip on the House. Obama has threatened to veto 11 bills.

Alexander said the vote to overturn the union election rule would take place under the Congressional Review Act, which limits debate and bars any changes in the repeal proposal. Obama may veto the measure, however, and it takes the customary two-thirds vote in each house of Congress to override him.

The law being used to target the labor rule has been used successfully used once. That was in 2001, when President George W. Bush signed legislation passed by a Republican-controlled Congress canceling an ergonomics rule that had been issued by the Labor Department near the end of the Clinton administration.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.