ShareThis Page
Connellsville Area expected to bring architect on board |

Connellsville Area expected to bring architect on board

Mary Pickels
| Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:55 p.m

Connellsville Area School Board expects to hire an architect today for a Junior High West renovation project.

Mike Omatick, director of buildings and grounds, was directed to obtain proposals last month from Crabtree, Rohrbaugh and Associates as well as Eckles Architecture to explore renovations needed to move elementary students into Junior High West.

Omatick said the proposals would be based on the total cost of the project.

The board decided in May to move junior high students to Junior High West and ninth-graders to the high school in the 2012-13 school year, close Zachariah Connell Elementary School at the conclusion of the 2012-13 school year and move the students to a renovated Junior High West in the 2013-14 school year.

Projected costs for renovating Connellsville Junior High West are estimated at $700,000 to $2 million.

In other business, the board will consider:

• A request to purchase a phone system for Dunbar Township Elementary School at a cost of $14,400 from ASCC Inc., through the Intermediate Unit 4 Smart Contract, to be paid by the capital reserve fund.

• Raising breakfast and lunch prices by 10 cents each, in accordance with Equity In School Lunch Pricing. Prices would increase from $1.95 to $2.05 for elementary students; from $2.25 to $2.35 for secondary; from $3.35 to $3.45 for adults, and from $1.25 to $1.35 for breakfast.

The board meets at 7 p.m. at the Connellsville Career and Technical Center. A special voting meeting will be on June 27 to address the 2012-13 budgets.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.