ShareThis Page
Connellsville softball eliminated from playoff contention after 10-0 loss to Norwin |

Connellsville softball eliminated from playoff contention after 10-0 loss to Norwin

| Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:03 p.m
Lori Padilla | For Trib Total Media
Connellsville's Kelsi Burkholder awaits a throw while Norwin's Johnna Karas slides into third base during a Section 1-AAAA game on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at Connellsville High School.
Lori Padilla | For Trib Total Media
Norwin's Megan Miller slides back to second while Connellsville's Brooke Miller gloves a throw during a Section 1-AAAA game on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at Connellsville High School.
Lori Padilla | For Trib Total Media
Norwin third baseman Erin Linhart lunges for the ball during a Section 1-AAAA game on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at Connellsville High School.
Lori Padilla | For Trib Total Media
Connellsville's Joelle Rosky dives back to third base while Norwin's Christiana Skrabak makes a grab during a Section 1-AAAA game on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at Connellsville High School.

It’s been a difficult season for the Connellsville softball team, and the Falcons’ very slim hopes of qualifying for the WPIAL Class AAAA playoffs were officially dashed thanks to a 10-0 home loss to Norwin on Tuesday.

But despite the setback, first-year coach Felicia Domasky made sure her team knows there is plenty to play for in the season’s remaining games.

“What I told them (after the game) is that we have to make it our goal to show other teams that we will compete,” Domasky said. “We have to be more consistent and we have to let other teams know that we will be coming for them next year.”

While the score was not indicative of a competitive game, the Falcons (5-7, 3-7) weren’t without opportunities to cash in runs and turn the momentum.

Connellsville managed six hits against Norwin pitcher Hannah O’Block, but couldn’t come up with a key hit. The Falcons stranded seven runners, including three in the fourth inning.

“We had some hits and a lot of people on base,” Domasky said. “But we couldn’t string our hits together, and that hurt.”

Conversely, Norwin hit in bunches. The Knights (7-3, 7-3) collected 11 hits against Connellsville’s Emily Keslar, including four in a decisive five-run fourth inning.

The Knights took a 1-0 lead in the second when O’Block tripled and scored on a single by Johnna Karas. Then in the third, the lead swelled to 3-0 as Erin Linhart scored on a wild pitch before Chrstiana Skrabak delivered an RBI single.

It was the start of a big game for Skrabak. She highlighted Norwin’s five-run fourth with a two-run homer. Maddy Wensel also came up big with a two-run double and Linhart lifted a sacrifice fly to help the Knights build an 8-0 advantage.

A sacrifice fly by Rae Sleith in the fifth and a run-scoring single by Shae Gillham in the seventh provided the final touches on Norwin’s offensive outburst.

“We had a tough loss to Albert Gallatin on Monday, so this was a good rebound for us,” Norwin coach Brian Mesich said.

With 10 runs on her side, O’Block pitched out of a few jams and maintained the shutout through six innings before giving way to Danielle Chorba, who pitched a scoreless seventh.

With the win, Norwin moves into a second-place tie with Penn-Trafford in the Section 1-AAAA standings.

“Right now, we have two (section) games left and we have a big game against Latrobe (Thursday),” Mesich said.

“Hopefully, we bring the bats like we did (Tuesday).”

Jackie Cramer and Emily Keslar each had two hits for the Falcons, and Megan Butler saved a couple of runs by making two great catches in center field. Otherwise, there weren’t many positives for Connellsville.

“They hit the ball, and we just couldn’t keep up,” Domasky said.

Jason Black is the local sports editor of the Daily Courier. Reach him at

Categories: News
Tags: |
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.