ShareThis Page
Connellsville swimmers Shreve, Urie achieve personal success |

Connellsville swimmers Shreve, Urie achieve personal success

Rick Wills
| Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:00 p.m
Ken Brooks | For Trib Total Media
Connellsville swimmers Alyson Urie (left) and Bayle Shreve each set a school record during the 2014-15 season.

Connellsville senior Bayle Shreve and junior Alyson Urie concluded the 2014-15 swim season in style as each broke a school record at the WPIAL Class AAA championships on Feb. 20-21 at Pitt.

Shreve broke the school record and finished 28th at WPIALs in the 100 backstroke (1::02.8). The record was held by Kendra Wagner. Shreve came close to the record in her sophomore and junior seasons, which helped keep her motivated.

“It is not in my character to give up on my goals once they have been set in my mind,” Shreve said. “I kept working hard and making the necessary sacrifices that it took, and that all paid off my senior year (at WPIALs). When I looked at the clock after just finishing my 100 backstroke and saw a time that broke the school record, I realized personal goals can always be achieved. You just have to want it more than anything.”

Urie came into the season already having set the record in the 200 individual medley. She accomplished her goal of breaking her record with a mark of 2:12.77, which was good enough for 12th place at WPIALs.

“My goal for this season was to re-break my record from last year and to qualify for every event at WPIALs,” Urie said. “I accomplished both of my goals. I owe my success to my coaches Kim Graziano and Marie Nedley. I enjoyed being one of the captains of the swim team to help the new swimmers and to make swimming more enjoyable.”

Urie will compete for the Greensburg YMCA swim team at YMCA states and nationals later this month.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.