ShareThis Page
Conspiracy added in teen’s drug death |

Conspiracy added in teen’s drug death

Chuck Biedka
| Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:00 a.m

KITTANNING: Conspiracy to deliver illicit drugs has been added to third-degree murder charges for three people accused of giving heroin and alcohol to a 17-year-old Manor boy who died last month.

Jeremy Calhoun “Chico” Thomas, 22, and Scott Dereck Boyer, 19, both of Elderton, and Sarah Beth Bureau, 18, of Johnson Avenue, Kittanning, also are charged with drug possession with intent to deliver and corruption of minors.

They are charged with giving powdered heroin and alcohol to Zachary Zion last month.

Zion, who would have been a Ford City High School senior this fall, was found dead Aug. 3 in an East Franklin hotel room.

A preliminary hearing for the three Friday was continued. Addition of the conspiracy to deliver illicit drugs charge prompted defense attorneys to ask for more time to prepare their cases.

“This is not amending the charges. This is a whole new charge,” said attorney Ron Valasek, of Lower Burrell, who represents Boyer. “Now we have to prepare a case with a new charge for three people who have little in common other than being in the same place.”

Pittsburgh attorney Jim Ecker, who represents Thomas, and Bureau’s attorney, Harvey Daniels of Monroeville, joined in the objection.

District Justice Samuel Goldstrohm of Rural Valley, agreed and asked the attorneys to talk with his staff to schedule a hearing.

“We’re saying there was an illegal agreement to deliver drugs to Zion,” Armstrong County Deputy District Attorney George Kepple said Friday.

Kepple said it was a “simple oversight” that state police didn’t file the conspiracy charge with other charges, Kepple said. “After review, we determined it was necessary to amend charges.”

Earlier this week Goldstrohm reduced $250,000 bond for Thomas, Boyer and Bureau from $250,000 to $25,000 and the three were released.

Three others are also charged in the Zion case.

Patricia Diane Crawford, 38, of Kittanning, her daughter, Natasha Mae Visnesky, 18, of Kittanning, and Philip M. Reed, 18, of Dayton, are charged with selling or giving alcohol to Zion and corruption of a minor.

Bond was initially set at $50,000 for Crawford, Visnesky and Reed. Goldstrohm reduced it to $25,000.

Crawford had posted bond before Friday. Visnesky and Reed remained in the county jail until Friday when Goldstrohm accepted a request to reduced bond.

Visnesky and Reed were released on their recognizance after the three told Kepple and their attorney,

Dennis P. Zawacki, of Pittsburgh, they would testify for the state.

Crawford, Visnesky and Reed waived charges to court so when the preliminary hearing continues, it only will involve Thomas, Boyer and Bureau.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.