ShareThis Page
Consultant questions PNC-First Niagara deal |

Consultant questions PNC-First Niagara deal

An independent banking consultant-economist claimed in a letter to the Department of Justice that PNC Financial Services Group Inc. “hand picked” a buyer for branches it must divest as part of the National City Corp. acquisition.

Kenneth H. Thomas said PNC’s sale of 57 branches to First Niagara Financial Corp. of Lockport, N.Y., was “insufficient to ensure that consumers, small businesses, and middle market businesses will continue to have sufficient choices for banking services and to enjoy the benefits of competition.”

Miami-based Thomas said PNC still will control 48 percent of the deposits in Pittsburgh market, while No. 2 deposit holder Citizens Bank holds only 8 percent. Thomas urged the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division to review the PNC-First Niagara transaction. PNC spokesman Brian Goerke declined to comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.