Controller audit finds flaws in Pittsburgh Public Works inventory system |

Controller audit finds flaws in Pittsburgh Public Works inventory system

The Pittsburgh Department of Public Works must do a better job of inventorying equipment, according to a controller’s audit released Tuesday.

City Controller Michael Lamb, whose office reviewed the department’s inventory from Jan. 1, 2012 to Aug. 1, 2013, found 12 pieces of light equipment missing from the Division 3 headquarters in Oakland.

Lamb said auditors found no evidence of theft, and he suspects the equipment was probably old and decommissioned. Light equipment includes tools worth $100 or more.

The audit found the department is not consistently tracking equipment after it is purchased.

He recommends the appointment of an inventory officer to do regular tracking and guard against theft.

Public Works has 1,748 pieces of equipment, including 876 vehicles and 872 tools.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.