Corbett considers potential savings in Medicaid |

Corbett considers potential savings in Medicaid

HARRISBURG — Over the next two months, Republican Gov.-elect Tom Corbett will examine potential savings in the state’s Medicaid program identified in an audit by Democratic Auditor General Jack Wagner, a Corbett spokesman said today.

“One thing he’s consistently said is, ‘We can find savings in the current budget,'” said Kevin Harley, Corbett’s campaign press secretary. “And one of the key areas to look at is the Department of Public Welfare.”

Corbett takes office Jan. 18.

With the state facing a deficit of as much as $5 billion next year, Wagner today touted the audit his office conducted more than a year ago, because of new figures he obtained. With final numbers from county asssistance offices, Wagner said the error rate in Medicaid is 15.5 percent. He previously it at 14 percent.

Even a 10 percent correction would yield $436 million for the 2011-budget and $1.9 billion over four years, Wagner said.

The errors essentially are overpayments to managed care companies after people leave the Medicaid program.

“(The Welfare Department) must stop this money from going out to insurance companies for thousands of people who are no longer eligible for this program,” Wagner said. “We can save hundreds of millions of dollars witout cutting benefits, simply by preventing improper payments.”

An estimated 2.1 million elderly and low-income Pennsylvanians rely on Medicaid for health insurance.

“It is a vital program and it is also a poorly run program because of DPW’s steadfast refusal to manage it properly,” Wagner said.

Harley said Corbett would “take a look at some other audits collecting dust in this administration, to see where we can save money.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.