ShareThis Page
Coulter takes aim at liberals in ‘Treason’ |

Coulter takes aim at liberals in ‘Treason’

Only the toughest liberals will be able to stand more than four pages of “Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism” without sputtering in rage and calling for capital punishment for all thin, leggy conservative blondes named Ann Coulter.

On second thought, few liberals will even get past “Treason’s” sucker-punch of a first sentence: “Liberals have a preternatural gift for striking a position on the side of treason.”

It’s all downhill from there for liberals, leftists, Democrats and their liberal-leftist-Democrat friends in the media, as Coulter, armed with the cruel sarcasm of a stand-up comedian and the rhetorical skills of an angry right-wing presidential speechwriter, indicts all of them with being wrong, naive, stupid, gutless or traitorous on every U.S. foreign policy issue, war or military intervention of the past 60 years.

Coulter, for those of you without TVs, is a best-selling author (“Slander”), syndicated writer and cable talk-show pundette whose rabbit-punching, politically incorrect column runs in the Trib each Friday.

Coulter’s enemies are most accurate when they accuse her of cranking out unfair generalizations about traitorous liberals and gutless Democrats like this typical one:

“Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America’s self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant. Fifty years of treason hasn’t slowed them down.”

Coulter has faults. She hyperbolizes, makes unfair comparisons and laughs at the idea of fair and balanced reporting. She makes no effort to point out the many foreign policy sins and shortcomings of conservatives or Republicans, even especially deserving bums such as Richard Nixon.

But why should she• She knows that her readers get the other side from mainstream media all the time. Except for a few token slaps at the stuffy patriotic Republican WASPs who used to run our blundering foreign policy, it’s open season on every liberal and Democrat you’ve ever heard of, from FDR through Carter and Clinton.

Coulter pummels all the right enemies — FDR, Commies, Alger Hiss, the Rosenbergs, the New York Times, the liberal media establishment, war resistors and the politicians and journalists of the early Cold War years who knew there were Communist spies in high government and military places but basically didn’t care.

People not already familiar with conservatism and its Hall of Heroes and Villains will be shocked by Coulter’s version of history, especially the McCarthy Era, which she concentrates on.

Not everyone will accept her claim that “The myth of ‘McCarthyism’ is the greatest Orwellian fraud of our times,” or that “Everything you think you know about McCarthy is a hegemonic lie.” Nor will they agree with her that Sen. Joseph McCarthy himself was the primary victim of McCarthyism.

But most readers will be amazed by how little they really know about those crazy, fascinating times and what its namesake and his enemies did and did not do.

Coulter is more than just a well-tuned rightwing joke machine. Her crack that “Vietnam is the left’s favorite war because America lost” is so cruelly true it breaks bones, even if you think the war in Southeast Asia was a horrible example of the folly of America’s interventionist foreign policy.

“Treason” will be despised by its liberal victims and dissed for its excesses by what she would call “girly-boy” conservatives who wish she weren’t so blunt, mean and unladylike.

But it’s no accident it’s already No. 4 on the New York Times best-seller list and she reportedly has landed a new $3 million publishing deal with Crown Forum. Coulter knows her audience and knows how to please it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.