ShareThis Page
Council, committee tangle in street fight |

Council, committee tangle in street fight

| Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:00 p.m

A new street near Heinz Field honoring a former Steelers coach has caused another dustup between Pittsburgh Councilman Bill Peduto and a city committee that reviews street names and addresses.

In a sometimes terse e-mail exchange last week, Peduto told Ray DeMichiei, head of the Address Review committee, that council should have signed off on the naming of Chuck Noll Way after receiving a recommendation from the committee.

The committee approved the name last year, but Allegheny County has not yet entered the street into the 911 system because it is not yet built.

“This is a new street and must be sent to council for action,” Peduto wrote on April 20. “The committee rules cannot override the city code. Please send all street changes to council.”

Peduto complained about the same issue to DeMichiei last year.

DeMichiei, the city’s emergency management deputy director, said the committee is best-equipped to make such decisions.

“I have and continue to maintain that addressing should be left to the technical experts,” DeMichiei wrote.

The e-mail exchange was contained in a letter that Peduto sent to city Solicitor Daniel Regan, questioning whether the committee was following city code, and if not, whether that meant its decisions could be legally challenged or voided.

The city hadn’t responded to Peduto’s letter as of Wednesday afternoon.

“You may not agree with it and you may even have very good public safety reasons to do so, but you cannot decide not to follow the law,” Peduto wrote in one e-mail. “I will certainly consider working with you on changes.”

In 2008, under legislation crafted by City Councilman Patrick Dowd, the city created the address committee, which DeMichiei said standardized what had been a political process or an afterthought.

The committee, which is comprised of officials from five city departments and Allegheny County Emergency Services, receives 10 to 15 requests a month to rename existing streets, name new ones or renumber addresses.

Its work came to the public’s attention last year, when it changed several similarly named streets because Allegheny County 911 sent dispatchers to the wrong address. Public Safety Director Michael Huss then ordered the address committee to review nearly 1,200 streets and make changes where necessary.

The committee’s meetings were closed to the public until September when the Trib gained access after discussions with city attorneys.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.