ShareThis Page
Council gives Brown Timber the OK to log |

Council gives Brown Timber the OK to log

Genea Webb
| Thursday, May 5, 2005 12:00 a.m

Logging could become more common in Penn Hills thanks to a permit that council approved. The permit allows Acme-based Brown Timber to log more than 65 acres of land on two parcels of land.

“This is new to urban communities,” said Howard Davidson, director of Planning in Penn Hills. “We made forestry a conditional use: Anyone wanting to cut down trees has to have 10 acres or more to an area. They also have to have erosion and soil plans, and have to go through two hearings, one with the planning commission and another with council.”

One parcel is in the 300 block of Pike Street and owned by Lee Brown.

The other parcel, owned by Roy Smith at the end of Valemont Drive, is a bone of contention for Bernice Berg and several nearby residents who worry that logging would cause problems for the neighborhood and the community as a whole.

“I’m not happy about this and neither are my neighbors. It’s a very sensitive area and it has a whole lot of red clay, which is slide prone,” said Berg, who has resided at 629 Valemont Drive since 1954.

Brandon Carkuff, chief forester of Brown Timber and Land Co., Inc., said Berg’s worries are unfounded.

“We’re going to be doing timber management, which is removing old trees and seeding, allowing for other ones to grow and for the young ones there to mature,” Carkuff said. “Everything we do is approved by the Allegheny Conservation District and we use erosion control materials.”

The logging is set to start this summer and will take three to four weeks.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.