ShareThis Page
Council members grow restless with oversight |

Council members grow restless with oversight

| Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:00 p.m

Frustrated City Council members are clamoring for a review of Pittsburgh’s finances to decide whether it’s time to end state-run recovery efforts.

The council tentatively approved a resolution Wednesday that asks state Department of Community and Economic Development Secretary Dennis Yablonsky to consider ending the city’s financially distressed status. A final vote is scheduled for Tuesday.

The city’s financial difficulties led Gov. Ed Rendell to declare Pittsburgh financially distressed in December 2003. Two oversight boards were established as a result: an Act 47 recovery team and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority.

“All I want to know from Act 47 and Dennis Yablonsky is, what is your plan?” said Councilwoman Twanda Carlisle. “All (the resolution) says is, let us know where we stand and why.”

Carlisle sponsored the resolution, which was written by Firefighters Local 1, the union that represents city firefighters. Firefighters would have an easier time negotiating favorable contracts if Yablonsky lifts the city’s distressed status.

One of the overseers shot down council’s plea.

“Is it time for Act 47 to leave, and is it time for the ICA to leave• My answer is no. I think they’ll both be very important to Pittsburgh for the next three to four years,” said John Murray, chairman of the state oversight board.

If council proceeds with its request, a public hearing would be held before Yablonsky makes his decision, DCED spokesman Kevin Ortiz said.

Act 47 requires municipalities to complete a year with a positive budget balance, Ortiz said. Yablonsky’s ruling wouldn’t affect the ICA, which is governed separately under state Act 11.

Councilman Bill Peduto, who joined Council President Luke Ravenstahl in voting against the resolution, said the city must establish a three-year track record that shows revenues exceeding expenses to prove that it deserves to be free of state oversight.

“The best analogy I can make is that we were rushed to the emergency room a few years ago; we’re still on the table, the catheter is still in, and we’re wanting to jump off because we feel good. I think we need to stay in the hospital a couple years more in order to get whole,” he said.

B.J. Leber, chief of staff for Mayor Bob O’Connor, said the mayor wanted council to delay a vote on the resolution until after today’s scheduled public hearing on the city’s 2006 budget. The budget still needs council’s approval.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.