ShareThis Page
Council OKs settlement over officers |

Council OKs settlement over officers

Susan K. Schmeichel
| Friday, October 4, 2002 12:00 a.m

McKeesport Council has approved an out-of-court settlement in a federal lawsuit involving the reassignments of 13 police officers and fire department deputies.

The settlement negotiated last month by U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose does not become final until it is signed by the 13 officers involved.

The officers, who are still employed by the city, will be reinstated to their acting positions and will be allowed to retain their positions if they pass the civil-service exam. The lawsuit brought by the officers stemmed from Mayor Wayne Kucich’s decision to demote the officers soon after he took office in January 2000.

Kucich said the demotions were a promise to implement civil-service testing for command positions in both the police and fire departments. The 13 officers, though, contend Kucich’s actions were motivated by their alleged support of mayoral opponent and now Council President James Brewster.

As part of the settlement, the city will pay back wages to 13 officers, as well as attorney’s fees.

The back-wage claim averages approximately $30,000 per officer, minus taxes and other deductions. The money owed the officers will be paid in two installments next February and August.

The attorney’s fees are approximately $200,000. McKeesport’s insurance carrier will pay the $200,000 toward the fees, with the city submitting payment of the back-wage claim.

“We are very pleased with the settlement — $600,000 is a substantial amount of money,” Sam Cordes, attorney for the officers, said Thursday.

Cordes said the settlement “makes it clear that the mayor did what he is alleged to have done.”

Kucich, though, said there is no admission of liability or fault with the settlement.

“Taking care of business — that’s how I view it,” Kucich said. “Sometimes in operating the city, you are called upon, as mayor, to put aside your personal beliefs and make a decision that is better for the city in the long run. This is one of those decisions.”

Brewster abstained from council’s vote on the settlement, which was approved by a vote of 5-1. Voting against the settlement was Councilwoman Laura Jenkins. Voting in favor of the settlement were Councilmen Dale McCall, Lance Cash Sr., Regis McLaughlin, Darryl Seqina and Richard Dellapenna.

Brewster said that council’s main concern is that the officers’ reinstatements be part of the settlement.

“We felt that it is the fair thing to do,” he said, adding that the financial part of the settlement was handled by the judge and the attorneys.

Brewster said council had to weigh the possibility of a potential loss of $2.5 million if the case had gone to trial.

“It seemed clear from discussions with the attorney that a lesser settlement would be in the best interest of the people of McKeesport,” he said. “We are hoping that it is over and we can move on to more positive things in the city.”

Only five of the 13 officers are still employed by McKeesport.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.