ShareThis Page
Council seeks special geese hunting permit |

Council seeks special geese hunting permit

Mark Berton
| Monday, February 18, 2002 12:00 a.m

There are going to be a lot of geese to cook if a controlled hunt takes place at the new Emsworth baseball field.

Paul Getz, vice president of the Emsworth Borough Council, said the geese are destroying the grass and becoming a nuisance in the area.

Game officials said the geese most likely are Canada geese.

“Evidently, they really like the fresh grass down there,” Getz said.

He said Gary Fujak, a wildlife conservation officer, surveyed the site and made recommendations to the borough.

Getz said dogs, firecrackers and scarecrow-like devices all can be tried to scare geese away from the site, which sits beneath the former Dixmont State Hospital.

“In (Fujak’s) opinion, the best option is to hunt them,” Getz said.

While the hunting season for geese is over, Getz said, the borough can apply to the state Game Commission for a special nuisance geese permit, which would allow year-round discretionary hunting on the site.

“They would be controlled hunters, usually from hunting clubs,” he said. “(The field) falls outside of all the safety zones in that area.”

The field is near a community park and a residential neighborhood. Geese would be hunted with shotguns, not rifles.

Rob Bennett, a borough councilman, stressed that the hunt would be a “last-ditch” effort to control the geese.

Getz said the borough should apply for the permit now because it takes time to obtain.

“If we don’t need it, we don’t use it,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.