ShareThis Page
Council to pick 2 for hearing |

Council to pick 2 for hearing

| Wednesday, April 3, 2002 12:00 a.m

Plum Council tonight is scheduled to appoint two residents to serve on the Plum Civil Service Commission to hear the appeal of fired police Chief Terry Focareta.

The interviews of applicants for the position are scheduled for 5:30 p.m., and the appointments are expected to follow at a 6 p.m. special meeting, Plum council President Clem Barbarino said Tuesday.

Focareta’s appeal hearing is scheduled for 9 a.m. Saturday. The hearing is open to the public.

Focareta, 53, was fired by council Jan. 24 after members charged him with conduct unbecoming a police officer, neglect of duty and immorality.

Maria Gingery, interim borough manager, said yesterday the borough received letters from four applicants. Additionally, council plans to interview the nine residents who applied for slots for the previous hearing date, which was March 23. That hearing was postponed at the request of Focareta’s attorney, Patrick Sorek.

Council, at a special meeting March 19, postponed the appointments because of the delay in the hearing.

Barbarino said council did not plan to interview the first round of nine applicants because there wasn’t sufficient time.

Residents criticized council for not identifying the applicants. Plum Solicitor Bruce Dice said the names become part of the public record when they are appointed to the commission.

The provisional appointments were prompted by the removal of two of the three commission members, David Majernik and Dennis Daugherty. The third member of the commission, Patricia Fitzgerald, will remain seated for the case.

Majernik is scheduled to be called as a witness in the Focareta case. Majernik was a member of the civil service commission last year at the time of the incident that officials said prompted Focareta’s dismissal by council. Sorek raised a conflict-of-interest question about Daugherty, a former police officer who was under the chief’s supervision.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.