ShareThis Page
Council weighs South Main Street traffic signals |

Council weighs South Main Street traffic signals

| Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:00 a.m

Directional signs on Main Street in Zelienople will have to wait, but a new glow soon will be seen on South Main Street.

The borough realigned the lanes of Main Street last year to make a left-turn lane for people traveling north on Main and turning left onto Culvert Street and Beaver Street.

Council members, however, were concerned that motorists who were unaware of the change were causing a hazard by switching lanes quickly when they saw the pavement markings. Council members wanted to hang a sign from an overhead cable that would alert drivers of the upcoming left-turn lane.

PennDOT has responded that the sign will not be allowed until arrows are painted on the streets, something that must wait for warmer weather. And when the signs are placed overhead, PennDOT wants them to be mounted on poles rather than hung from a cable.

Finally, borough manager Marla Marcinko said, PennDOT officials might require that flashing yellow warning signals on Spring and Culvert streets be replaced because the existing lights do not meet PennDOT standards. The cost of replacing those two signals is about $30,000, Marcinko said.

Council members have not decided about replacing those lights but did elect last week to place a new street light on Main Street, near Hockenberger Motors, to illuminate the road lanes and possibly allow motorists an earlier look at the lane configuration.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.