ShareThis Page
Councilman pushes for transit over toll road |

Councilman pushes for transit over toll road

Jim Ritchie
| Saturday, June 15, 2002 12:00 a.m

A freshman city councilman Friday called for alternatives to the Mon-Fayette Expressway’s proposed entrance into Pittsburgh that weighs transit as an option.

Councilman William Peduto said the billions of dollars set aside to link the expressway with the city near Oakland could be spent on other much-needed transportation improvements, such as expanding light rail and enhancing existing roads.

“Before we make this massive investment, we should at least examine the alternatives,” said Peduto, who represents the northern Squirrel Hill and Oakland areas of the city.

Peduto has joined an effort by PennFuture — a city-based group opposed to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission’s highway plan — to craft options to the expressway’s entrance into the city near Hazelwood. He also is a member of the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission, the region’s transportation planning agency.

The councilman said the Turnpike Commission should consider the planning agency’s three key studies in the works that look at transit improvements. The studies focus on a transit option in the eastern suburbs, airport corridor and the overall Pittsburgh region.

The Turnpike Commission is building the 100-mile network of toll roads from Interstate 68 in West Virginia to Pittsburgh, along with a spur to Monroeville and another to Pittsburgh International Airport, known as the Southern Beltway. The package will cost $4 billion to build.

The segment through Allegheny County — often referred to as the Route 51-to-Pittsburgh leg — would stretch 24 miles through the Mon Valley. A required document detailing the effects of the project, called a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, was released May 31.

Joining Peduto at the morning news conference yesterday at the City-County Building, Downtown, was Carnegie Mellon University’s Richard Florida, a professor of regional economic development.

Florida said his research shows that professionals who live and work in Pittsburgh want better transit options rather than new toll highways.

“In all of our focus groups and interviews, this is the kind of thing that would make them want to leave Pittsburgh,” Florida said. “Just because we planned this for 40 years doesn’t make it right.”

After learning of Peduto’s statement yesterday, one of the highway project’s most vocal supporters said looking at alternatives is part of the ongoing process.

“We welcome the opportunity to talk with Councilman Peduto,” said Joe Kirk, executive director of the Mon Valley Progress Council. “We invite him to participate in the process. We can’t comment on his alternative because we haven’t seen it yet.”

The Turnpike Commission’s document is available for public review and comment for 75 days. The time period will include four informational meetings and three public hearings. The next meeting will be held Tuesday in Braddock.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.