ShareThis Page
Councilman says Ravenstahl issued threat over vehicle policy |

Councilman says Ravenstahl issued threat over vehicle policy

| Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:00 p.m

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl threatened Pittsburgh City Council if it voted to reduce the number of take-home vehicles, as it did today, said Councilman Bruce Kraus.

“The mayor came up to me and his exact words to me were, ‘We’re coming after you,'” Kraus said.

To exact political retribution, Ravenstahl threatened to push legislation that would slash each councilman’s budget to $61,000 a year, Kraus said. Each council office currently gets $82,000 annually to pay members’ salaries and other expenses.

“The notion that a threat was made was ridiculous,” Ravenstahl said.

The mayor said he simply challenged Kraus to curtail council’s spending under the provisions of Pittsburgh’s five-year financial recovery plan created under state Act 47 — the same provisions Kraus and other council members used to justify reducing the number of take-home cars from 61 to 29.

“If council members take the position that Act 47 is a binding document then they themselves should live by that,” said Ravenstahl. The mayor said he sees Act 47 as a “roadmap” and not a set of rules to be strictly followed.

According to Kraus, Ravenstahl told him, “Try working on $61,000 a year on your council salary budgets.”

Kraus said he replied: “If you feel that that best serves the interests of the people of the city of Pittsburgh to cripple council, have at it. That was the extent of the conversation.”

The exchange took place Wednesday during a political fundraiser for Councilman Jim Motznik at La Mont restaurant in Mt. Washington.

Motznik, a Ravenstahl ally, introduced the budget-cutting legislation today, and accused Council President Doug Shields of maintaining a $149,000 “slush fund” in various City Council accounts. Shields denied the claim.

Ravenstahl said he was aware of Motznik’s intentions and supports the legislation.

Motznik said the cuts to each councilman’s office budget are in line with the city’s five-year financial recovery plan. The reduction in the number of take-home cars also is part of the recovery plan.

“The reality is if you’re going to live by the sword, you’re probably going to have to deal with both sides of the sword,” Motznik said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.