ShareThis Page
County to seek grant to upgrade Belmont Complex |

County to seek grant to upgrade Belmont Complex

KITTANNING — More improvements are on the way for the Belmont Complex.

At a public meeting yesterday, the Armstrong County Commissioners approved a resolution to submit a grant application and agreement to the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

The grant would be used to replace arena floor matting, lifeguard chairs, the pool’s chlorine system, railing around the pool and diving stands and to install additional parking lot lights.

The total cost of the items is $175,000. The grant with the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources is for half of the amount of the project with the county and the Belmont Complex combining to provide a 50 percent match.

“It addresses safety issues,” Jeanna Baker, Belmont Complex assistant manager, said.

In other county business, the commissioners:

— Proclaimed October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month.

— Approved the municipal waste disposal contracts between the county and Greenridge Reclamation Landfill of Scottdale and County Landfill of Leeper.

— Approved the agreement between the county and the Department of State for the county plan to address the requirements of HAVA, Help America Vote Act.

— Approved an increase of $4,643.50 for sanitary sewer projects in Kiski Township.

— Reappointed Jeff Fullerton, Philip Tack, Richard Vesley and Vickie DeThomas to the Local Workforce Investment Board for three-year terms.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.