ShareThis Page
Court: Jury selection part of public trial |

Court: Jury selection part of public trial

| Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the constitutional right to a public trial in criminal cases means that jury selection, including questioning of prospective jurors, should not be done behind closed doors.

By a 7-2 vote, the high court ruled for Eric Presley, a Georgia man convicted of cocaine trafficking. He argued his constitutional right to a public trial had been violated when the judge closed the courtroom during the questioning of prospective jurors.

The judge in Presley’s trial justified the move by saying the room was too small to accommodate the potential jurors and the public.

The Constitution’s Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury.

In the ruling, the Supreme Court disagreed with the judge’s decision to close jury selection. It said Presley later showed that 14 prospective jurors could have fit in the jury box, the remaining 28 could have fit on one side of the courtroom and the public could have sat on the other side of the courtroom.

Although the ruling held that all aspects of jury selection should be conducted in public, it left open the possibility that for certain reasons, including the safety of prospective jurors, it could be closed in a specific case.

“Trial courts are obligated to take every reasonable measure to accommodate public attendance at criminal trials,” the court majority said in its decision.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, a journalists’ rights group, supported Presley.

It said the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press, protects public access to questioning of prospective jurors. The group called such openness vital to ensure the basic fairness of a criminal trial.

The court ruled that the judge in the case could have reserved some rows for the public, could have divided up the group of prospective jurors to ease courtroom congestion and could have instructed possible jurors not to talk to those in the audience.

Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. “Today’s decision belittles the efforts of our judicial colleagues who have struggled with these issues,” Thomas wrote.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.