Cowanshannock fire destroys pole barn, vehicles |

Cowanshannock fire destroys pole barn, vehicles

A fire in Cowanshannock left a pole barn in ruins and destroyed several tractors inside Tuesday evening.

The fire started about 6:15 p.m. when sparks from burning garbage ignited the 28-foot by 40-foot building at Fred Troup’s home at 361 Clearfield Pike Road.

“He had been burning garbage behind the garage prior to the fire, so we’re pretty much assuming the wind took the hot sparks from the garbage pile,” Rural Valley fire Chief Kevin Nelson said.

The blaze quickly engulfed the building, destroying the tractors, an ATV and tools inside.

“That’s a big loss, with such a big building and all that content,” Nelson said. “Plus, there was a pickup truck right outside of the garage that burned.”

Explosions reported before fire crews arrived were likely caused by propane tanks in the garage, Nelson said. Kindled by dry leaves, the fire spread through the yard toward a wooded area behind the building.

“The garage was close to the woods, but it didn’t get that far,” Nelson said. “We got it under control really well.”

Along with Rural Valley, crews from Dayton, Kittanning Township, Elderton and Plumville fought the fire for about two hours.

No one was hurt in the fire, and Troup’s home was not in danger, Nelson said. Troup could not be reached Wednesday.

Julie E. Martin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1315 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.