ShareThis Page
Crackdown planned on waste oil storage |

Crackdown planned on waste oil storage

| Saturday, August 30, 2003 12:00 a.m

The Coast Guard and the state are cracking down on companies improperly storing waste oil products along waterways following a leak from a sunken barge in the Monongahela River.

The Coast Guard’s Marine Safety Office in Pittsburgh and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection are partnering to identify waterside facilities and abandoned barges that might be storing waste oil products inappropriately.

Improperly stored waste products “may be especially vulnerable during ice and high-water periods,” the Coast Guard said Friday.

Last week, officials founds an oil sheen flowing into the Mon from a sunken barge at the Bright Star Marine Facility in lower Speers, Washington County.

Coast Guard and DEP investigators found a marine facility had another potential hazard: A barge in poor condition that was moored there had about 5,000 gallons of improperly stored waste oil, according to the Coast Guard.

The owner was removing the oil, but the Coast Guard said other vessels may have pumped their waste oil into that barge through uncovered hatches, which since have been repaired.

The oil escaping from the sunken barge “was determined to pose limited risk to the environment as the oil proved residual from various equipment and tools that were on board and currently submerged,” the Coast Guard said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.