ShareThis Page
Cricket Lighters to pay $200K in Mercer County triple-fatal fire |

Cricket Lighters to pay $200K in Mercer County triple-fatal fire

| Tuesday, March 4, 2008 12:00 a.m

Cricket Lighters will pay $200,000 to a settle a lawsuit regarding the death of three people in a 1993 fire in Mercer County.

The Stockholm-based company agreed to pay the settlement to end litigation that began in 1995. Gwendolyn Phillips sued Cricket after the death of her daughter and two grandsons in a Hermitage fire, claiming that Cricket should have had childproof features on its lighters.

The fire was started when Phillips’ 2-year-old grandson, Jerome Campbell, lit linen with a lighter he found in his mother’s purse. Jerome; his mother, Robin; and 3-year-old Alphonse Crawford were killed in the fire.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.