ShareThis Page
Crosby: whining comments ‘garbage’ |

Crosby: whining comments ‘garbage’

Sidney Crosby has been called a whiner before by antagonistic Flyers fans, but the timing of this attack was harder for him to accept.

Maybe six years ago it held a little more truth, but not now, he said.

“I’ll be the first one to admit (that during) my first couple years I was pretty hard on the refs,” said Crosby, one of the “two (expletive) whining stars” that Rangers coach John Tortorella criticized Thursday. “I’ve come a long way since then.”

Crosby addressed the coach’s words following Friday’s practice at Southpointe, a few hours before Tortorella was fined $20,000. Crosby said he expected Tortorella would apologize for “blowing up” and “everything will be forgotten.”

But Crosby also discussed the root of any “whining” perception he might carry, saying he has changed his approach since his rookie season.

“I’m nowhere near where I was then,” he said, “and to get those kinds of remarks (now) is uncalled for and not warranted. • I don’t need to sit here and defend myself for something that’s not going on. But if they want to try that garbage, try it.”

Crosby suggested having one camera follow him and Evgeni Malkin, the other so-called “whining star,” while another camera watched Rangers captain Ryan

“You’ll see who’s over there (with the referees) more,” Crosby said. “(Tortorella) should worry about his own players.”

But this insult wasn’t isolated. The Penguins are gutless whiners who take cheap shots and play dirty, if you listen to angry coaches around the Atlantic Division.

Flyers coach Peter Laviolette started the smear campaign Sunday, and Tortorella continued it Thursday by calling the organization “arrogant.” Suddenly, it seems trashing the Penguins has become trendy.

“I don’t know when this all started,” Crosby said, “(or whether) this is part of the new tactics in the playoffs. But it’s garbage.”

Penguins coach Dan Bylsma called the insults “gamesmanship” by playoff-bound coaches trying to influence others, yet he hasn’t gotten involved. Not even after Laviolette broke a stick along the boards and called the Penguins coaches “gutless.”

Then Thursday night, after the Penguins beat the Rangers,
Tortorella used profanity and maligned Crosby and Malkin while addressing a hit by Brooks Orpik. Bylsma called it “part of his coaching manual to go off.”

“If anything, they’re trying to persuade officials,” Crosby said. “… I really hope they’re not listening to that because it’s nonsense. They are trying every which way to gain an advantage.”

The Penguins complete their regular season today against the Flyers at Consol Energy Center and then begin a seven-game playoff series with them next week that could be filled with hard hits and a few cheap shots. Moments that certainly will test patience.

“After a while you learn (complaining to the referees) is a waste of your energy,” Crosby said. “It doesn’t help anything. They’re not going to change their mind after penalties. Yelling isn’t really going to help. I think it’s just something with time you learn. It’s experience.

“I’m a pretty competitive guy, but you’ve got to learn to kind of control that sometimes and put your energy towards things that matter. That’s playing hockey.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.