Crowd rallies in East Liberty against Ferguson shooting |

Crowd rallies in East Liberty against Ferguson shooting

About 60 people attended a rally Saturday afternoon in East Liberty to protest the fatal shooting of an unarmed black 18-year-old in Ferguson, Mo., by a white police officer.

“We mobilized around Ferguson, but we plan on staying vigilant,” said Celeste Scott, 38, of Beltzhoover, who co-organized the event.

The protest at Penn and Highland avenues included reading the names of unarmed black people killed by police nationwide, calls to end police brutality and calls for business boycotts to enact change.

It included a 4 12-minute moment of silence, which represented the 4 12 hours that Michael Brown’s body lay in the street in Ferguson after he was shot.

A coalition of activists and concerned citizens organized the protest, said Scott, who has a 16-year-old son.

“And I’m out here because I would never want to experience this,” she said in reference to Brown’s death.

Co-organizer Donna Ray, 36, of East Liberty has a 20-year-old son.

“What can you tell your kids? … It’s like open season every time you turn on your TV,” she said.

Ray said one reason she got involved is that her son is a close friend of Leon Ford, 21, who was paralyzed from the waist down as a result of being shot five times by Pittsburgh police Officer David Derbish during a 2012 traffic stop in Highland Park.

Derbish claimed the shooting was in self-defense.

A student protest for Ferguson is planned for 4 p.m. Monday at Community College of Allegheny County in the North Side, and a student rally against police brutality is scheduled for 5 p.m. Friday at Schenley Plaza in Oakland.

Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.