ShareThis Page
CWA national board OKs strike |

CWA national board OKs strike

The Communications Workers of America’s national executive board voted unanimously Tuesday to authorize a strike by US Airways’ 6,000 customer service agents, clearing the way for the union’s president to set a strike date.

The union’s rank and file had approved a strike authorization vote by 86 percent to 14 percent in early November — if the bankrupt airline rejected its collective bargaining agreement.

The Association of Flight Attendants, which represents about 5,200 US Airways flight attendants, is voting on strike authorization this week.

The flight attendants and customer service agents have threatened to strike only if Judge Stephen S. Mitchell rejects their contracts.

US Airways will be in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Alexandria, Va., on Thursday, asking Mitchell to set aside all of its union agreements and impose $1 billion in wage and benefit cuts on 28,000 union employees.

The company and its unions continued to meet this week, but union leaders said no agreements appeared to be imminent.

“The airline has demanded devastating pay and benefit concessions from the agents,” the CWA said yesterday.

“We are continuing to negotiate with each of our unions that do not have agreements, in hopes of reaching consensual agreements,” said US Airways spokesman David Castelveter. “Any work action under these circumstances would be illegal and in no one’s best interest.”

Representatives of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, which represents about 9,000 mechanics and fleet-service workers, met with the company yesterday. Spokesman Joseph Tiberi said no details were available.

Teddy Xidas, president of the Flight Attendants Local 40 in Pittsburgh, sent a letter to her 700 local members exhorting them to approve strike authorization.

“The company is asking us to accept terms that could force most of us to seek other employment,” Xidas said. “Those terms will be emulated by other carriers in their quest to compete. If we become the leader of the pack and accept those terms, I believe our careers will never recover.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.