Archive

ShareThis Page
D.C. charges woman over armed protest | TribLIVE.com
News

D.C. charges woman over armed protest

WASHINGTON — A Michigan woman remains in jail Saturday after being arrested with a gun during a protest outside the White House — the second person to be detained with a firearm in two days.

April Debois, 23, of Mount Morris, was arrested about 30 minutes after the start of President Obama’s immigration speech during a protest along the White House’s north fence when Secret Service officers noticed that she was wearing a purple handgun in a holster along her right front waist.

When officers took her aside and questioned her, they discovered 13 loose bullets in an inside jacket pocket and a magazine loaded with six bullets in an outside jacket pocket, the charging documents said.

She was charged with carrying a pistol without a license in the District of Columbia, possession of an unregistered firearm and possession of unregistered ammunition. She is scheduled to return Monday to District of Columbia Superior Court for another hearing.

R.J. Renae Kapheim, 43, of Davenport, Iowa, was charged with illegally carrying an unregistered firearm in the District of Columbia. He is accused of having a .30-caliber rifle, which was loaded; about 40 rounds of ammunition; and a 6-inch knife in his car parked within sight of the White House on Wednesday.

His charge is a felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000. He remains in jail and will be in court Monday.

Kapheim approached a Secret Service checkpoint at about 1 p.m. Wednesday and informed agents that the president had called him and told him to drive to the White House, according to his charging documents.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.